Archive for October, 2009

Application for a protected action ballot order

Wednesday, October 28th, 2009

Australian Maritime Officers’ Union, v Newcastle Port Corporation [2009] FWA 829 Vice President Watson applied the test in at paragraphs 31 & 32 of Total Marine Services Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [2009] FWAFB 368 as to whether there had been a genuine attempt to reach agreement: “[31] In our view the concept of genuinely [...]

Safety laws shift blame to company directors

Tuesday, October 27th, 2009

ABC news report – Company directors will face the risk of being personally prosecuted for workplace safety breaches if new national guidelines come into force. Brisbane Barrister – David Cormack

$47,763,997.46 – Summary Judgment Application

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

Limitation period & the plaintiff’s sister’s notes

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

Queensland Racing Limited – Board (un) selection

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

Asbestos payout crisis as James Hardie’s $1.8bn fund about to run out

Monday, October 26th, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

1965 – risk of mesothelioma to an infant – slight or far-fetched

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

Fair Work Amendment (State Referrals and Other Measures) Bill 2009

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Please Login to view this Content.(Not a member? Join Today!)

Employees as fiduciaries

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Michael Wilson and Partners Limited v Robert Colin Nicholls & Ors [2009] NSWSC 1033 The protagonists in this case are the well known law firm and 3 of their former professional members. To reach the analysis of employee fiduciary obligations the decision traverses forum and conflict of law issues. Justice Einstein provides an excellent analysis [...]

Whether “income protection” is “prohibited content”

Thursday, October 22nd, 2009

Australian Maritime Officers Union v Sydney Ferries Corporation [2009] FCAFC 145 On appeal the court held income protection as part of subclause 12.8.9 of the Sydney Ferries Corporation Maritime Officers Enterprise Agreement 2006 – 2008 was not prohibited content within the meaning in s.358 of the Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth.). The basis for the [...]

David Cormack, Barrister