Archive for the 'Contract' Category

Extrinsic evidence and interpreting ‘gap’ insurance policies

Tuesday, September 7th, 2010

Allens Arthur Robinson  In brief: A recent NSW Court of Appeal decision helps clarify the circumstances when extrinsic facts may be taken into account in interpreting written contracts and is a reminder of the precision required when drafting insurance coverage clauses. Partner Dean Carrigan (view CV) and Lawyer Rhiannon Eagles look at the decision. Background [...]

Occupiers liability – managing agent, indemnity clause and contribution legislation

Sunday, August 22nd, 2010

Laresu Pty Ltd v Clark [2010] NSWCA 180 Catchwords TORTS – negligence – occupier’s liability – whether owner of commercial premises delegated to managing agent its duty of care as occupier of common property – whether managing agent an occupier of common property – plaintiff injured in fall on unlit stairs – whether breach of [...]

Double insurance and estoppel by convention

Sunday, August 1st, 2010

Australasian Medical Insurance Ltd & Anor v CGU Insurance Ltd [2010] QCA 189 CATCHWORDS: INSURANCE – THE POLICY – THE INSURED – where second appellant was a partnership of 15 pathologists – where first appellant was the partners’ professional indemnity insurer – where respondent insurer issued second appellant with policy covering certain risks associated with [...]

Bailment of sperm & negligence claims

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Kate Jane Bazley v Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd [2010] QSC   An application was brought by a widow in respect of stored sperm (gametes) of her late husband seeking an order the respondent continue to store them. The relevant terms of the contract between the respondent and the applicant’s late husband incorporated the National Health and Medical [...]

HCA – remoteness & compensation on an undertaking as to damages

Wednesday, March 17th, 2010

European Bank Limited v Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates [2010] HCA 6   The central dispute concerned the ‘remoteness’ of compensation of $1,251,088.33 ordered by His Honour Gzell in respect of an undertaking given as to damages in litigation. The Court of Appeal upheld the appeal on the basis that Gzell J had erred [...]

David Cormack, Barrister