<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Insurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/category/insurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au</link>
	<description>David Cormack, Barrister</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 22:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Extrinsic evidence and interpreting &#8216;gap&#8217; insurance policies</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/extrinsic-evidence-and-interpreting-gap-insurance-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/extrinsic-evidence-and-interpreting-gap-insurance-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 00:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=2000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allens Arthur Robinson  In brief: A recent NSW Court of Appeal decision helps clarify the circumstances when extrinsic facts may be taken into account in interpreting written contracts and is a reminder of the precision required when drafting insurance coverage clauses. Partner Dean Carrigan (view CV) and Lawyer Rhiannon Eagles look at the decision. Background [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/extrinsic-evidence-and-interpreting-gap-insurance-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double insurance and estoppel by convention</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-estoppel-by-convention/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-estoppel-by-convention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=1826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australasian Medical Insurance Ltd &#38; Anor v CGU Insurance Ltd [2010] QCA 189 CATCHWORDS: INSURANCE – THE POLICY – THE INSURED – where second appellant was a partnership of 15 pathologists – where first appellant was the partners’ professional indemnity insurer – where respondent insurer issued second appellant with policy covering certain risks associated with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-estoppel-by-convention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Insurer&#8217;s onus of proof in raising a limit on indemnity</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/insurers-onus-of-proof-in-raising-a-limit-on-indemnity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/insurers-onus-of-proof-in-raising-a-limit-on-indemnity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries DDT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=1396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wallaby Grip Limited v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited; Stewart v QBE Insurance (Australia) Limited [2010] HCA 9 (30 March 2010) Compulsory common law coverage in Queensland only commenced on 1 July 1963. In cases where injuries are latent and for instance, in occupational mesothelioma injuries where the exposure to asbestos occurred before this date; the proof of the existence [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/insurers-onus-of-proof-in-raising-a-limit-on-indemnity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HCA &#8211; Transcripts for Special Leave (Brisbane)</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/hca-transcripts-for-special-leave/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/hca-transcripts-for-special-leave/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 21:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries Workers' Comp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[  WorkCover Queensland v Amaca Pty Ltd &#38; Anor [2010] HCATrans 48 (12 March 2010) Public Trustee of Queensland v Fortress Credit Corporation (Aus) 11 Pty Ltd &#38; Ors [2010] HCATrans 49 (12 March 2010) Selected Seeds Pty Ltd v QBEMM Pty Limited &#38; Ors [2010] HCATrans 50 (12 March 2010) Spain v Workcover Queensland [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/hca-transcripts-for-special-leave/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WorkCover&#8217;s right to indemnity &amp; proportionate liability</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/workcovers-right-to-indemnity-contribution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/workcovers-right-to-indemnity-contribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 03:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal Injuries Workers' Comp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=1190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WorkCover Qld v AMACA P/L &#38; Anor [2009] QCA 72 It is timely to review the above case having regard to the Special Leave application before the High Court to be heard on 12 March 2010. The agreed facts [2] Rex Noel Thomson contracted mesothelioma as the result of exposure to asbestos in the course of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/workcovers-right-to-indemnity-contribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Double Insurance/Contribution and the s45 of the ICA (Cth.)</title>
		<link>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-the-s45-of-the-ica-cth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-the-s45-of-the-ica-cth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 06:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davidcormack</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/?p=910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Zurich Australian Insurance Ltd v Metals &#38; Minerals Insurance Pte Ltd [2009] HCA 50 (2 December 2009)   The appeal centred on section 45 of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984 (Cth.)   Section 45  provides: &#8220;(1) Where a provision included in a contract of general insurance has the effect of limiting or excluding the liability [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.barristerdirect.com.au/double-insurance-and-the-s45-of-the-ica-cth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
