Day

June 7, 2011
I refer you to the example of Quinlivan v Norske Paper Mills (Australia) Ltd [2010] FWA 883 (valid reason, but harsh) and compare it with Darvell v Australian Postal Corporation [2010] FWAFB 4082 (failure to follow a reasonable direction). A further example of balancing “harshness” with a valid reason is the decision of Lawrence v...
Read More
Harry Zoumas v TNT Australia Pty Ltd T/as TNT Express [2011] FWA 3065 (valid reason) Paul L Quinlivan v Norske Paper Mills (Australia) Ltd [2010] FWA 883 (valid reason, but harsh) Stuart Rollo v Serco Traffic Services (Vic) Pty Ltd FWA 3224 (valid reason) Brisbane Barrister – David Cormack
Read More

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Categories