March 26, 2012
Haros v Linfox Australia Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 42 The appellant Haros was at first instance unsuccessful against Linfox alleging during the negotiation for his employment that misleading representations were made. The trial judge found the employment contract was inconsistent with the representations alleged. Haros was unsuccessful on the appeal not only in relation to this aspect, but that...
Read More

Recent Comments