Day

May 17, 2013
Ogden v Britax Automotive Equipment Pty Ltd (ACN 007165442) [2013] QDC 83   JUDGE:   Farr SC DCJ ORDER:   The application is allowed. CATCHWORDS:   APPLICATION – disclosure – application successful – Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 – rule 211(1) – whether respondent failed to mitigate his loss – summary dismissal – where respondent...
Read More
Harding v Boulton & Anor [2013] QDC 85   JUDGE:   Smith DCJ ORDER: That the signatures of the Respondents on the Request for trial date be dispensed with pursuant to r 469 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules The trial be listed in the sittings commencing 25 November 2013. The parties provide written submissions...
Read More
Weinstock v Beck [2013] HCA 14 I refer you to the judgment summary.   David Cormack – Brisbane Barrister.
Read More
Beck v Weinstock [2013] HCA 15 (1 May 2013) I refer you to the judgement summary.   The plurality (Hayne, Crennan and Kiefel JJ) said: “As Handley AJA rightly pointed out, however, it is necessary to distinguish between the rights attached to a share and the enjoyment of those rights. The holder of a share...
Read More
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 I refer you to the judgment summary. David Cormack – Brisbane Barrister
Read More
Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v Keating [2013] HCA 20 I refer you to the judgment summary.   David Cormack – Brisbane Barrister.
Read More
Beckett v New South Wales [2013] HCA 17 I refer you to the judgment summary. The High Court unanimously held that its previous decision in Davis v Gell (1924) 35 CLR 275 should not be followed.   David Cormack – Brisbane Barrister.
Read More
Wallace v Kam [2013] HCA 19   I refer you to the judgment summary   A limiting principle of the common law is that the scope of liability in negligence normally does not extend beyond liability for the occurrence of such harm the risk of which it was the duty of the negligent party to...
Read More

Recent Comments

    Archives

    Categories