Vowles v Osgood & Anor (No 2) [2012] QSC 126

Vowles v Osgood & Anor [2012] QSC 82

A $1.28 million damages claim was rejected last week amid controversy over the extent to which video surveillance evidence contradicted a plaintiff’s testimony as to the seriousness of his motor accident related neck and back injuries.

Suncorp, the rear-ender’s insurer, conceded liability but sought to limit Ben Vowles’ damages by capturing him on DVD over a period of 12 months on 27 separate days.

The insurer obtained a secret pre-trial suppression order and confronted both medical specialists with it in the absence of the plaintiff and his lawyers.

Read more…

Reproduced with the permission of Carter Capner Law.

Related Posts

Recent Comments

    Categories