Room with a view: avoiding alleged misrepresentation in developments

Mirvac Queensland Pty Limited v Holland & Anor [2010] QSC 330 and Mirvac Queensland Pty Ltd v Tyan Pty Ltd ATF Tavakol Investment Trust [2010] QSC 333

Allens Arthur Robinson

Two recent Queensland Supreme Court decisions have highlighted the need for developers to control the information their agents provide to prospective purchasers, after apartment buyers were unable to terminate contracts based on claims of misleading and deceptive conduct related to views from the apartments. Partners Tony Davies (view CV) and Tracey Harrip (view CV) and Lawyer Kris Byrne report.

 

Reproduced with permission of Allens Arthur Robinson and in accordance with their terms of use.

Related Posts

Recent Comments

    Categories